We started with language of discussion, giving opinions, disagreeing and offering explanations. I was able to elicit most of this language from the group however with a group at a lower level I might have needed to do some pre-teaching. I made an assumption ( I know, I know) that they would be ok with the concept of a debate. I did give them written instructions on their papers but in hindsight, wonderful thing that it is, I should probably have gone over it verbally with them before sending them off in groups. This night have prevented them all doing slightly different things. I should also have made it clear that the for and against groups needed to plan their speeches separately. Not every group got this without being told. Again I suppose I should have know better. Although this is possibly one of the problems with teaching teachers I expected them to know more and I should have treated them like any other foreign language class.
I had four groups with 4 different topics
- Twitter is a better tool for communication than face book
- The internet is a good way to experience different cultures
- Electric buses will replace trains as the transport of the future
- Globalisation has made people more open minded
The second topic was a challenge as none of them could find a way to agree with the point but they gave it a good shot. They did however produce the quote of the week "you can watch a man fall of a camel on youtube but you will never know what it is like to fall from a camel until you have fallen from a camel"
The third group completely missed the structure of the debate but they did use the target language and, I assume more by good luck than good management, they had 2 strongly opposing teams culminating in a lively discussion. Not a debate as such but I'll take it.
The final debate was easily the best as they stuck to the structure well and they all argued their points and made some very interesting arguments. They were also the only group to really bring the audience into the debate.
Regarding the audience, in my plan I had wanted them to react to grammar used in the morning session. They should have spent the morning working on reported speech but due to the nature of the group and the adaptations that needed to be made to the course this didn't quite happen. If I ran debates again I would do two things. 1st I would make the grammar an integral part of it because I see debating as a fantastic way to use target language in a structured situation. 2nd I would make the topics more similar which I think might bring the audience in to it a bit more.